Note to Readers

Please Note: The editor of Norway Corruption blog is a member of the Ecology of Peace culture.

Summary of Ecology of Peace Problem Solving: The problems of poverty, unemployment, war, crime, violence, food shortages, food price increases, inflation, police brutality, political instability, loss of civil rights, vanishing species, garbage and pollution, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, racism, sexism, Nazism, Islamism, feminism, Zionism etc; are the ecological overshoot consequences of humans living in accordance to a Masonic War is Peace international law social contract that provides humans the ‘right to breed and consume’ with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits.

Ecology of Peace factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; they should cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to sustainably protect and conserve natural resources.

EoP v WiP NWO negotiations are documented at MILED Clerk Notice.

Monday, May 7, 2012

Norway Supreme Court: EcoFeminist Application for Review & Declaratory Order



Min Justice: Is Norway (A) a Children-of-Rainbow Legal Multiculti (right to invoke Sharia?) State; or (B) Monocultural Indigenous EU Supremacy Legal Hegemonic State?

Application Requests Supreme Court to Order the Norwegian Ministry of Culture to act in accordance to European Court of Human Rights ruling in Lithgow & others v. United Kingdom, and clarify in adequately accessible and sufficiently precise statement; whether Norway is (A) a ‘Children of the Rainbow’ State legally committed to Multiculturalism, providing all cultures their right to invoke cultural law and hence granting the Applicant her rights to invoke Radical Honoursty cultural law; or (B) a Monocultural Indigenous European Supremacy Legal Hegemonic State, and that the Labour Party Immigration policy is a tactic to maintain their grip on power, by importing Non-Western immigrants as Labour Party vote-fodder.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 07 May 2012


From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 12:31 PM
To: Crt: SupremeCrt: Chief Justice Tore Schei (**@hoyesterett.no); Crt: SupremeCrt: Kjersti Ruud (**@hoyesterett.no)
Subject: [NO SUPREME CRT: Justice Tore Schei] NO-Breivik: Supreme Crt Applic for Review & Decl. Order

TO: Chief Justice Tore Schei
Post: Postboks 5678 Sluppen 7485 Trondheim
Telefon: 73 56 70 00 | Telefaks: 73 56 70 01


IN THE NORWAY SUPREME COURT: NORWAY V. BREIVIK

NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR DECLARATORY ORDER & REVIEW

Oslo District Court Case #: 11-188627 MED-05


In the Application of:

LARA JOHNSTONE
Application to proceed as In Forma Pauperis Jus Sanguinis Radical Honoursty African EcoFeminist White Refugee

In the matter between:

KINGDOM OF NORWAY V. ANDERS BREIVIK

Please find attached the following [PDF] for Application to the Norway Supreme Court in this matter:

* NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR DECLARATORY ORDER & REVIEW: Application in terms of Article’s 2, 4, 85, 100, 110a, 110b, of Norwegian Constitution; and Article’s 1, 5, 6, 9, 13 and 14 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“ECHR”) and Rule 44 § 2 of the Rules of the Court

* Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone, Jus Sanguinis Radical Honoursty African EcoFeminist White Refugee

* Annex A: The Applicants 30 November 2011 Application to the Oslo District Court: Application for a Writ of [I] Habeus Mentem on behalf of Anders Breivik psycho-cultural integrity right to a free and fair trial; and [II] writ of Certiorari/Review of the Psychiatric Evaluation Report of Psychiatrists: Synne Serheim and Torgeir Husby as to the Mens Rea political necessity criminal liability of Anders Breivik terrorist acts, on 22 July 2011.

* Annex B: The Applicants 15 April 2012 Application to the Oslo District Court: Application to proceed as In Forma Pauperis Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee Amicus Curiae for an Order (1) to approve the Applicant as an In Forma Pauperis Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee Amici Curiae, and (2) Amending the Charges Against the Defendant [Breivik] and Applicant [Johnstone] to include Treason in terms of Article 85 of Norwegian Constitution, and if found guilty, in a free and fair trial; to be executed by firing squad.

* PROOF OF SERVICE Affidavit of Lara Johnstone


Respectfully Submitted

LARA JOHNSTONE, Pro Se
PO Box 5042 George East,
South Africa

**************************

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 10:24 AM
To: Pros Holden: Politiet (**@politiet.no); Pros Holden: Politiet (**@namsfogden.no); Pros Holden: Politiet (**@politiet.no); Pros Holden: Politiet (*@politiet.no)
Cc: Pros Holden: Grete Faremo (**@jd.dep.no); Pros Holden: Min. Justice (**@jd.dep.no); Pros Holden: Min. Justice: Morten Ruud (**@jd.dep.no); Pros Holden: Min. Justice: Tonje Meinich (**@jd.dep.no)
Subject: [Pros. Svein Holden, via Politeit & Min.Justice Faremo] NO-Breivik: Supreme Crt Applic for Review & Decl. Order

TO: Prosecutor Svein Holden
c/o & via: Norwegian Police
Postboks 8193 Dep., 0034 Oslo
Tel/Fax: 23 29 10 00 | 23 29 10 01

TO: Prosecutor Svein Holden
c/o & via: MinJustice: Grete Faremo
P.O. Box 8005 Dep, 0030 Oslo
Tel: 22 24 90 90


IN THE NORWAY SUPREME COURT: NORWAY V. BREIVIK

NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR DECLARATORY ORDER & REVIEW

Oslo District Court Case #: 11-188627 MED-05

In the Application of:

LARA JOHNSTONE
Application to proceed as In Forma Pauperis Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee Amicus Curiae

In the matter between:
KINGDOM OF NORWAY V. ANDERS BREIVIK

Please find attached the Notice of Motion and Founding Affidavit.

Application requests the Supreme Court to provide the following orders:

[A] Applicant to be admitted as a Jus Sanguinis Radical Honoursty African EcoFeminist White Refugee Applicant in this matter, and granted Assistance of Council/Support in this matter from the Norwegian Refugee Council and/or ELENA.

[B] An Order demanding the Norwegian Ministry of Culture to act in accordance to European Court of Human Rights ruling in Lithgow & others v. United Kingdom, and clarify in adequately accessible and sufficiently precise statement; whether Norway is (A) a ‘Children of the Rainbow’ State legally committed to Multiculturalism, providing all cultures their right to invoke cultural law and hence granting the Applicant her rights to invoke Radical Honoursty cultural law; or (B) a Monocultural Indigenous European Supremacy Legal Hegemonic State, and that the Labour Party Immigration policy is a tactic to maintain their grip on power, by importing Non-Western immigrants as Labour Party vote-fodder.

[C] To Review the Oslo District Court failure to act in accordance of due process to a Jus Sanguinis Radical Honoursty African EcoFeminist White Refugee Applicant member of the Radical Honesty culture, in the following applications:

a. The Applicants 30 November 2011 Application for a Writ of [I] Habeus Mentem on behalf of Anders Breivik psycho-cultural integrity right to a free and fair trial; and [II] writ of Certiorari/Review of the Psychiatric Evaluation Report of Psychiatrists: Synne Serheim and Torgeir Husby as to the Mens Rea political necessity criminal liability of Anders Breivik terrorist acts, on 22 July 2011. (Annex A)


b. The Applicants 15 April 2012 Application to proceed as In Forma Pauperis Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee Amicus Curiae for an Order (1) to approve the Applicant as an In Forma Pauperis Jus Sanguinis Norwegian African White Refugee Amici Curiae, and (2) Amending the Charges Against the Defendant [Breivik] and Applicant [Johnstone] to include Treason in terms of Article 85 of Norwegian Constitution, and if found guilty, in a free and fair trial; to be executed by firing squad. (Annex B)


TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that if you intend opposing this application you are required;-

(a) to notify applicant in writing on or before 28 MAY 2012; and

(b) within 15 DAYS after you have so given notice of your intention to oppose the application to file your answering affidavit, if any; and further that you are required to appoint in such notification an address, including an email address, at which you will accept notice and service of all documents in these proceedings.

If no such notice of intention to oppose is given, the applicant will request the Registrar to place the matter before the Chief Justice to be dealt with in terms of the relevant rules in accordance to the Supreme Court Test.


Respectfully Submitted

LARA JOHNSTONE, Pro Se
PO Box 5042 George East,
South Africa

***************************

SENT TO:

  • NO SUPREME COURT: Chief Justice Tore Schei [SS]
  • OSLO DISTRICT COURT: Registrar [SS]
  • PROSECUTION: Prosecutor Svein Holden, c/o & via: Norwegian Police & Min of Justice [SS]
  • DEFENDANT: Anders Breivik, c/o: Geir Lippestad, Advokatfirmaet Lippestad AS [SS]
  • VICTIMS FAMILIES, c/o Trond Blattman [SS]
PART A:
  • NORWEGIAN REFUGEE COUNCIL: Elizabeth Rasmusson, Secretary General [SS]
  • UN INDIGENOUS RIGHTS SPC RAPORTEUR: James Anaya, Special Rapporteur, Rights of Indigenous peoples [SS]
  • ELENA NORWEGIAN COORDINATOR: Adv Halvor Frihagen & Brynjulf Risnes, Adv.firmaet Andersen & Bache-Wiig AS [SS]
  • ELENA OSLO LEGAL ADVISOR: Advokat Signe Blekastad, Adv. Trond Olsen Naess, Advokatfirmaet Furuholmen AS [SS]
  • ELENA OSLO LEGAL ADVISOR: Advokat Carolyn Midsem, Advokatene Midsem og Jagmann [SS]
  • ELENA OSLO LEGAL ADVISOR: Advokat Bente Mostad Tjugum, Advokatfirma Hoff, Schøning & Tjugum [SS]
  • ELENA OSLO LEGAL ADVISOR: Kjell T. Dahl, Firma: Advokatfirma Dahl og Ibsen AS [SS]
  • ELENA OSLO LEGAL ADVISOR: Advokat Carl K. Rieber-Mohn, Advokat Arild K. Humlen, Advokatene Rieber-Mohn m.fl. [SS]
  • ELENA OSLO LEGAL ADVISOR: Advokatfirmaet Mette Lisbeth Jensen AS [SS]
  • ELENA OSLO LEGAL ADVISOR: Legal Advisor Andreas Furuseth, NO Org for Asylum Seekers [SS]
  • ELENA OSLO LEGAL ADVISOR: Advokat Thor Gardarsson [SS]
PART B:
  • MIN. JUSTICE: Anniken Huitfeldt, Norwegian Ministry of Culture [SS]
  • PROGRESS PARTY: Siv Jensen, Fremskrittspartiet [SS]
  • ISLAMIC COUNCIL OF NORWAY: Mehtab Afsar General Secretary, Islamic Council of Norway [SS]
  • CHURCH OF NORWAY: Gen. Sec. Berit Hagen Agøy, Council for Ecumenical & Intnl Relations [SS]
  • MUSLIM SOCIETY IN TRONDHEIM: Imam Jorunn Jasmin Oksvold, Muslim Society in Trondheim [SS]
  • ISLAMIC CULTURAL CENTER: Imam Mehboob-ur-Rehman, Islamic Cultural Center [SS]
  • NUPI: Helge Luras, Afghanistan and Pakistan Program, Norwegian Inst of Intn’l Affairs (NUPI) [SS]
» » » » [PDF]

No comments:

FLEUR-DE-LIS HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

KaffirLilyRiddle: F(x)population x F(x)consumption = END:CIV
Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement (13:10)
Unified Quest is the Army Chief of Staff's future study plan designed to examine issues critical to current and future force development... - as the world population grows, increased global competition for affordable finite resources, notably energy and rare earth materials, could fuel regional conflict. - water is the new oil. scarcity will confront regions at an accelerated pace in this decade.
US Army: Population vs. Resource Scarcity Study Plan
Human Farming Management: Fake Left v. Right (02:09)
ARMY STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: Office of Dep. Asst. of the Army Environment, Safety and Occupational Health: Richard Murphy, Asst for Sustainability, 24 October 2006
2006: US Army Strategy for Environment
CIA & Pentagon: Overpopulation & Resource Wars [01] [02]
Peak NNR: Scarcity: Humanity’s Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity’s Consequences, by Chris Clugston
Peak Non-Renewable Resources = END:CIV Scarcity Future
Race 2 Save Planet :: END:CIV Resist of Die (01:42) [Full]