Complaint to Parliamentary Ombudsman: Slow case processing & discrimination by Environmental Appeals Board

Complaint to Parliamentary Ombudsman: Slow case processing & discrimination by Environmental Appeals Board of complaints against Aftenposten, Dagbladet, TV2, VG, Addresseavisen, Bergens Tidende & NRK



04 July 2012 | Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik

Slow Case Processing: Environment Appeals Board first deleted my appeal without reading it, then I was refused a case number and only provided a 'reference number'; and then told my 'enquiry' would only be addressed in August at the end of summer holidays.

Failure to Provide Case Processing: Environment Appeals Board appear to be attempting to refuse to provide me with a Case Number, in their attempts to obstruct my appeal from the public record.

Discrimination: Environment Appeals Board state my appeal is only an 'enquiry' and my 'enquiry' will only be addressed in August and refuse to confirm whether their 'summer holiday policy' is applicable to all complainants, or only my complaint; also refuse to put a public notice on their website stating their 'summer holiday policy' and whom it does and does not apply to.

Full Chronology of Facts details provided in attached PDF:

On 25 May 2012, Requests for Access to Environment and Health Information were submitted to the editors of Aftenposten, Bergens Tidende, Dagbladet, NRK, TV2, VG and Addresseavisen requesting information related to their decision-making to censor information related to the (I) Media's Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; (II) Norway's Stalinesque Political Psychiatry Tyranny. Each respondent was additionally provided a copy of the 22 April 2012 Earth Day: 'If It Bleads, It Leads' Media's Population-Terrorism Connection Report (42pgs). The Media Publications were requested to provide the requested information by 17:00 hrs on 11 June 2012. As of 17:00 hrs on 18 June 2012, they had declined to do so.

On 18 June 2012 a complaint was filed with the Environmental Appeals Board: Appeals of environmental information.

Since 18 June 2012 I have been trying to get Environmental Appeals Board to issue me with a Case number; they refuse stating they are on summer vacation until August, but refuse to say if this is standard policy for everyone, or only my complaint.

Min.Justice: G.Faremo: Complaint RE: Minister of Environment: Bård Vegar Solhjell & Environmental Appeals Board Obstruction of Justice

Min.Justice: G.Faremo: Complaint RE: Minister of Environment: Bård Vegar Solhjell & Environmental Appeals Board Obstruction of Justice



29 June 2012 | Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway Corruption

MinJustice: Grete Faremo
P.O. Box 8005 Dep, 0030 Oslo
Tel: 22 24 90 90

CC: Bård Vegar Solhjell, Minister of Environment
CC: Environmental Appeals Board: Appeals of environmental information

Request Clarification & Response:

1. Is there any Norwegian law that provides for discrimination of due process court or administrative procedures against Non-Norwegian citizens?

2. Do courts and administrative bodies in Norway totally shut down for Summer vacations?

3. Complaint: The Environmental Appeals Board appears to be refusing me access to its administrative due process complaint resolution procedures, and the Minister of Environment appears to approve such discrimination;

4. If your Administration is not their Supervisory Body, please provide contact details of whom exactly are their Supervisory Body/ies?

PM Stoltenberg and 1,676 NO Gov. Officials Notified that Breivik Acquittal is Justified by Media's Population-Terrorism Connection

PM Stoltenberg and 1,676 NO Gov. Officials Notified that Breivik Acquittal is Justified by Media's Population-Terrorism Connection


Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 12-14 May 2012

From: Habeus Mentem
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 12:01 AM
To: Nowegian Political Parties, National, Regional and Local Politicians, Editors and Journalists, NGO's etc.
Subject: Breivik Acquittal Justified by Media's Massive Censorship of Oslo Crt Proceedings?

Dear Norwegian Gov. Official,

1. Do the Media deliberately and intentionally CENSOR NON-VIOLENT PROBLEM SOLVING, to create a socio-political pressure cooker environment, for their 'If It Bleeds, it Leads' Corporate Profit from Terrorism?

2. If Breivik proves his Political Necessity arguments -- i.e. 'Breivik brutally killed 77 to save 770 million from impending Islamic colonisation, massively censored from public discourse by media' -- should he be acquitted?

3. In the absence of a media censorship campaign, Breivik would have raised his complaints non-violently. What has been the media and Oslo Court's response to non-violent applications on behalf of Breivik receiving a free and fair trial?

4. Is there a massive media censorship campaign to censor the information that there are liberals, environmentalists, feminists, who care about whether Breivik receives a free and fair trial?