Bar Assoc: Disciplinary Complaints: NCS Petersen | ND Paasche | N Aga | OH Hovde | O Rød | OE Hagen | OR Holm-Olsen | P Morset | PA Amundsen

Norsk Advokat Foreningen: Disciplinary Complaints: Niels-Christian S. Petersen | Nikolai Dericq Paasche | Nils Aga | Odd Harald Hovde | Olav Rød | Ole Edward Hagen | Ole-Richard Holm-Olsen | Peder Morset | Per Arve Amundsen

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 18 June 2012

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”

Bar Assoc: Disciplinary Complaints: MHE Haugland | M Randen | M Eiebakke | ME Nyland | M Skoklefald | M Lindbeck | M Engesbak | NC Hall | N Bjønness

Norsk Advokat Foreningen: Disciplinary Complaints: Marie Helene Earl Haugland | Marte Randen | Martin Eiebakke | Mette Ekroll Nyland | Mette Skoklefald | Monica Lindbeck | Morten Engesbak | Nadia Christina Hall Østby-Deglum | Nicolai Bjønness

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 18 June 2012

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”

Bar Assoc: Disciplinary Complaints: KH Strømme | KL Haarr | K Morch | K Lykke | L Engdahl | LM Brimi | LS Børsand | LK Evju | MB Aas

Norsk Advokat Foreningen: Disciplinary Complaints: Knut Henrik Strømme | Kristin Larsen Haarr | Kristin Morch | Kristine Lykke | Lars Engdahl | Lilli Marie Brimi | Linda Solberg Børsand | Linn Kristin Evju | Maria Bergram Aas

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 18 June 2012

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”

Bar Assoc: Disciplinary Complaints: GM Indreiten | H Winje | H Lilleby | HV Haug | HE Thorsberg | HR Steinholt | H Salomon | H Braanen | H Elness

Norsk Advokat Foreningen: Disciplinary Complaints: Gunn Marit Indreiten | Halldis Winje | Hanne Lilleby | Hans Vilhelm Haug | Hans-Erik Thorsberg | Hans-Richard Steinholt | Hege Salomon | Helene Braanen | Helene Elness

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 18 June 2012

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”

Bar Assoc: Disciplinary Complaints: EK Holbye | ES Refsdal | Eva EJ Holm | FM Karlsen | F Wisth | GSG Lyng | GH Ahlgren | G Bergan | GI Midtbø

Norsk Advokat Foreningen: Disciplinary Complaints: Elna Kristin Holbye | Endre Skjelbred Refsdal | Eva Elisabeth Johnsen Holm | Flemming M. Karlsen | Frode Wisth | Gard SG Lyng | Gry Hege Ahlgren | Gunhild Bergan | Gunn Iren Midtbø

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 18 June 2012

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”

Bar Assoc: Disciplinary Complaints: A Rye-Holmboe | A Braseth | AK Schjødt | A Sjødin | A Røkeberg | B Falch-Koslung | B Storhaug | BH Hoff | BO Roli

Norsk Advokat Foreningen: Disciplinary Complaints: Annichen Rye-Holmboe | Annie Braseth | Annæus Kristofer Schjødt | Arvid Sjødin | Astrid Røkeberg | Bendik Falch-Koslung | Benedicte Storhaug | Bengt Haadem Hoff | Bente Oftedal Roli

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 18 June 2012

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”

Bar Assoc. Disciplinary Complaints: A Brenden-Veisal | A Kjøren | AB Salvesen | A Haldorsen | A Haraldsvik | A Nerland Hovde | AE Grøndahl | AK Bohinen | AG Tingstad

Norsk Advokat Foreningen: Disciplinary Complaints: Adeline Brenden-Veisal | Anders Kjøren | Andreas Bjørn Salvesen | Anitra Haldorsen | Anne Haraldsvik | Anne Nerland Hovde | Anne Elisabeth Grøndahl | Anne Kristine Bohinen | Anne-Gry Hazeland Tingstad

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 18 June 2012

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”

Bar Assoc: Discpilinary Complaints: M.Y. Larsen | S. Hallgren | F. Elgesem | G. Lippestad | V.H. Baera | T. Jordet | O.I.A. Gron

Norsk Advokat Foreningen: Disciplinary Complaints: Mette Yvonne Larsen | Siv Hallgren | Frode Elgesem | Geir Lippestad | Vibeke Hein Baera | Tord Jordet | Odd Ivar Aursnes Gron

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 13 June 2012

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”

482 Norwegian Lawyers & Law Professors Notified that Breivik Acquittal is Justified by Media's Population-Terrorism Connection

482 Norwegian Lawyers & Law Professors Notified that Breivik Acquittal is Justified by Media's Population-Terrorism Connection

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 16 May 2012

From: Habeus Mentem
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 12:01 AM
To: Nowegian Political Parties, National, Regional and Local Politicians, Editors and Journalists, NGO's, Oslo University Professors & Lecturers, Lawyers etc.
Subject: Breivik Acquittal Justified by Media's Massive Censorship of Oslo Crt Proceedings?

Dear Advocates / Law Professors,

1. Do the Media deliberately and intentionally CENSOR NON-VIOLENT PROBLEM SOLVING, to create a socio-political pressure cooker environment, for their 'If It Bleeds, it Leads' Corporate Profit from Terrorism?

2. If Breivik proves his Political Necessity arguments -- i.e. 'Breivik brutally killed 77 to save 770 million from impending Islamic colonisation, massively censored from public discourse by media' -- should he be acquitted?

3. In the absence of a media censorship campaign, Breivik would have raised his complaints non-violently. What has been the media and Oslo Court's response to non-violent applications on behalf of Breivik receiving a free and fair trial?

4. Is there a massive media censorship campaign to censor the information that there are liberals, environmentalists, feminists, who care about whether Breivik receives a free and fair trial?

NO Supreme Crt: Dep Sec Gen: Kjersti Buun Nygaard Response to EcoFeminist Indigenous Rights Application to Norway Supreme Court in Breivik Matter

NO Supreme Crt: Dep Sec Gen: Kjersti Buun Nygaard Response to EcoFeminist Indigenous Rights Application to Norway Supreme Court in Breivik Matter

Judgement from the Oslo District Court: My legal application (per ecolaw email) - Affidavit part C: District Court Monocultural Masculine Insecurity EU Supremacy, paragraphs 30 to 36 - informs you of the Judgement from the Oslo District Court which could politely be paraphrased as ‘Judge Opshal and Arntzen don’t have the honour and integrity to officially deny Johnstone’s application, let alone provide her with written reasons for why we are denying it, cause Johnstone practices problem solving, not parasite leeching, so Johnstone has fuck all followers, to force us to do our jobs, so we will just pretend Johnstone does not exist, hence Johnstone's applications to this court also don’t exist’.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 15 May 2012

From: Andrea Muhrrteyn
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 2:40 PM
To: DO-B: Muslim Soc Trondheim (**@msit.no); DO-B: Muslim Soc Trondheim: Imam (**@msit.no); DO-B: Muslim Soc Trondheim: Mehran Emadipour (**@hotmail.com)
Subject: [11.MuslimSocTrondheim.JJOksvold] NO Supreme Crt: Dep Sec Gen: Kjersti Buun Nygaard Response to SHARP Application

TO: [11] MUSLIM SOC. OF TRONDHEIM: JJ OKSVOLD

[04] NO REFUGEE COUNCIL: ELISABETH RASMUSSEN [05] UN SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR: INDIGENOUS RIGHTS: JAMES ANAYA [06] ELENA: LEG.ADV: FRIHAGEN, RISNES, BLEKASTAD, DAHL [07] ELENA: NOAS: ANDREAS FURUSETH [08] MINISTER OF CULTURE: ANNIKEN HUITFELDT [09] PROGRESS PARTY: SIV JENSEN [10] CHURCH OF NORWAY: BERIT HAGEN AGOY [11] MUSLIM SOC. OF TRONDHEIM: JJ OKSVOLD [12] NUPI: HELGE LURAS

Please find attached my PDF response to Supreme Court: Deputy Secretary General: Kjersti Buun Nygaard refusal to provide a case number for my case.