Note to Readers

Please Note: The editor of Norway Corruption blog is a member of the Ecology of Peace culture.

Summary of Ecology of Peace Problem Solving: The problems of poverty, unemployment, war, crime, violence, food shortages, food price increases, inflation, police brutality, political instability, loss of civil rights, vanishing species, garbage and pollution, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, racism, sexism, Nazism, Islamism, feminism, Zionism etc; are the ecological overshoot consequences of humans living in accordance to a Masonic War is Peace international law social contract that provides humans the ‘right to breed and consume’ with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits.

Ecology of Peace factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; they should cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to sustainably protect and conserve natural resources.

EoP v WiP NWO negotiations are documented at MILED Clerk Notice.

Monday, May 14, 2012

104 Norwegian NGO Officials Notified that Breivik Acquittal is Justified by Media's Population-Terrorism Connection



104 Norwegian NGO Officials Notified that Breivik Acquittal is Justified by Media's Population-Terrorism Connection

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 16 May 2012



From: Habeus Mentem
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 12:01 AM
To: Nowegian Political Parties, National, Regional and Local Politicians, Editors and Journalists, NGO's, Oslo University Professors & Lecturers, Lawyers etc.
Subject: Breivik Acquittal Justified by Media's Massive Censorship of Oslo Crt Proceedings?

Dear Norwegian NGO Official / Citizen,

1. Do the Media deliberately and intentionally CENSOR NON-VIOLENT PROBLEM SOLVING, to create a socio-political pressure cooker environment, for their 'If It Bleeds, it Leads' Corporate Profit from Terrorism?

2. If Breivik proves his Political Necessity arguments -- i.e. 'Breivik brutally killed 77 to save 770 million from impending Islamic colonisation, massively censored from public discourse by media' -- should he be acquitted?

3. In the absence of a media censorship campaign, Breivik would have raised his complaints non-violently. What has been the media and Oslo Court's response to non-violent applications on behalf of Breivik receiving a free and fair trial?

4. Is there a massive media censorship campaign to censor the information that there are liberals, environmentalists, feminists, who care about whether Breivik receives a free and fair trial?


***********************************************************************
FACT: MEDIA CENSORSHIP WAS BREIVIK'S PRIMARY TERRORISM MOTIVATION:
***********************************************************************

Breivik's primary final motivation for Oslo/Utoya Terror Attacks was the Norwegian Media's Censorship:

Oslo Organized Crime Police Investigation Report "Explanation of 22 July 2011": "[Breivik] has been censored for years. He mentions Dagbladet and Aftenposten as those who among other things have censored him..... He says that he also wrote “essays” that he tried to publish via the usual channels, but that they were all censored..... As long as more than twelve were executed, the operation will still be a success. The experts ask how the number twelve comes into consideration. Twelve dead are needed to penetrate the censorship wall, he explains..... The goal was to execute as many as possible. At least 30. It was horrible, but the number had to be assessed based on the global censorship limit...... He believes he had to kill at least twelve, because there is a censorship-wall preventing an open debate about what is happening in the country..... So I knew I had to cross a certain threshold to exceed the censorship-wall of the international media."


***********************************************************************
FACT: DECEMBER 2011: MASSIVE MEDIA CENSORSHIP IN BREIVIK TRIAL
***********************************************************************

‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media’s Population-Terrorism Connection (PDF)

1,283 Norwegian Media Officials participate in massive Media Censorship Coverup of EcoFeminist Habeus Mentem Application to Oslo Court in Support of Breivik (1) Breivik's Right to Legal Sanity and a Free and Fair Trial; (2) The only logical outcome of a real ‘free and fair trial’ in Norway v. Breivik was: acquittal or the death penalty.

CENSORED BY 1,283 Norwegian Media Officials

***********************************************************************
FACT: APRIL 2012: MASSIVE MEDIA CENSORSHIP IN BREIVIK TRIAL
***********************************************************************

‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media’s Population-Terrorism Connection (PDF)

Over 1,283 Norwegian Media Officials participate in massive Media Censorship Coverup of EcoFeminist Amicus Curiae Application to Oslo Court in Support of Breivik (1) Breivik's Right to Legal Sanity and a Free and Fair Trial; (2) The only logical outcome of a real ‘free and fair trial’ in Norway v. Breivik was: acquittal or the death penalty.

CENSORED BY OVER 1,283 Norwegian Media Officials


***********************************************************************
FACT: 10 MAY 2012: ECOFEMINISTS INDIGENOUS RIGHTS APPLIC TO SUPREME COURT
***********************************************************************

EcoFeminists Deep Green Ecology Indigenous Rights Application Filed in Norway v. Breivik Supreme Court


***********************************************************************
FACT: 11 MAY 2012: NEWS RELEASE TO INTNL NEWS WIRES: ECOFEMINISTS BREIVIK APPLIC TO NO SUPREME COURT: CENSORED
***********************************************************************

On 10 May 2012 the Application was finalized for the Norway Supreme Court.

On 11 May 2012 a 'test media censorship firewall' News Release was published to all International Wire Services, which includes: Reuters, Associated Press, Agence France Press (AFP), British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), Voice of America.

NEWS RELEASE:
Daniel Quinn on Totalitarian Agriculture (04:19)
GEORGE ZA / TRONDHEIM NO: On 10 May an EcoFeminist member of Radical Honesty SA culture, filed a Deep Green Ecology Indigenous Rights application in the Norway Supreme Court, which includes UN Special Rapporter on Indigenous Rights, James Anyana as one of the respondents.

The Norway Supreme Court are asked to issue two declaratory orders and review two applications submitted to the Oslo District Court in the Breivik matter. The initial Declaratory Order asks that the African EcoFeminist Applicant be admitted to the Norway v. Breivik matter as a Jus Sanguinis Radical Honoursty African EcoFeminist White Refugee Applicant.

The EcoFeminist applicant states that she is a Jus Sanguinis (Right of Blood) descendant of Norwegian artillery officer and citizen: Johan Pieter FÜRSTENBERG, who was born about 1760 in Bergen, Norway and then emigrated to South Africa.

Johnstone states she is an Indigenous European, because she is Jus Sanguinis (Right of Blood) directly descended from Norwegian, French, Dutch, British and German Settler Progenitor/s who traveled to South Africa as ‘settler' farmers, soldiers, medical personnel, religious and political administrators, in response to, and as a result of, their Nations Geopolitical ‘Colonial Empire' Lebensraum Decision-making policies, to find only the Bushman, as indigenous natives.

Her Jus Sanguinis predecessors ‘Colonial Empire' actions were motivated by their decision thousands of years ago to give up their sustainable Law of Limited Competition hunter gatherer / agrarian policies, to adopt unsustainable Totalitarian Agriculture policies, which results in surplus food production / population, creating population Lebensraum pressures culminating in resource, culling and conquering wars for new territory.

If approved, the EcoFeminist Amicus would address alternative legal arguments from a Problem Solving Radical Transparency EcoFeminists perspective as opposed to the Prosecution & Defense's Parasite Leeching Masculine (Reason and Logic) Insecurity Patriarchal perspectives to allow the court to base its decision on a more comprehensive, natural law deep green ecology legal framework.

Radical Honoursty Sustainability argues that a healthy ecological environment based on carrying capacity laws of sustainability is a sine qua non for all other constitutional rights. Legally this means that an individual whose lifestyle is sustainable, in terms of procreation (2 children or less per family) and consumption (ecological footprint) should be entitled to other civil and human ‘rights', whereas individuals whose lifestyle are not sustainable should be denied other rights until they amend their lifestyle to being sustainable.

Johnstone is 45 years old, has never been on welfare, has used contraception since the age of 19 to avoid pregnancy. She has lived an ecological small footprint life; to avoid aggravating overpopulation, resource wars; materialist consumerism and resource depletion. Her Ecological Footprint, excluding ‘Child-Free' factor is 13.16 gha.

The second Declaratory Order requests the Norwegian Minister of Culture to clarify whether Norway is legally a ‘Children of the Rainbow' Multicultural State, granting the Applicant her rights to invoke Radical Honoursty cultural law.

The court has acknowledged receipt but not yet issued a case number.

[SEE News Release PDF]

***********************************************************************
FACT: MEDIA'S TERRORISM CONNECTION PROVEN TRUE
***********************************************************************

Media deliberately and intentionally CENSOR NON-VIOLENT PROBLEM SOLVING, to create a socio-political pressure cooker environment, for their 'If It Bleeds, it Leads' Corporate Profit from Terrorism.

If the RULE OF LAW, not the left wing notion of RULE OF EMOTION or the right wing notion of RULE OF MEN is applied in this case; then according to the Necessity Defence, if Breivik proves his arguments; one of them being massive Media Censorship, then he should be acquitted.

Now if the media -- as part of his trial -- are involved in deliberately obstructing justice by means of censorship; that adds significant weight to Breivik's argument of Media Censorship of the issues he considers important to be raised in public discourse.

If Breivik proves his Necessity arguments -- which can be summarized as 'Breivik brutally killed 77 to save 770 million from impending Islamic colonisation, massively censored by media' -- he should be acquitted.

Respectfully,


Lara Johnstone
Habeus Mentem: Right 2 Legal Sanity
Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored
http://norway-v-breivik.blogspot.com/

**********

SENT TO: 104 Norwegian NGO Officials:


European Commission on Refugees & Exiles (ECRE): NOAS (14) [SS]

Ann-Magrit Austena; Ingvald Bertelsen; Ragnhild Lero; Aziz Ghanizadeh; Hawdam Salih; Paula Tolonen; Camilla Risan; Hans Olav Konsvik; Mohammed Fitwi; Vanja Vujadin; Andreas Furuseth; Jon Ole Martinsen; Abduhwahab Said; Razita Kaimova


NDR: Norwegian Defence Research (11) [SS]

Office; Anne-Lise Hammer; Espen Skjelland; Jan Torp; Paul Narum; Jon Skjervold; Anders Eggen; Jan Botnan; John Mikal Stordal; Vidar Andersen; Johnny Bardal


NUPI: NO Inst. for International Affairs (79) [SS]

Vegard Valther Hansen; Chen Chr Andvig; Axel Borchgrevink; Fulvio Castellacci; Elin Demiraslan; Kristin Fjaestad; Jakub Godzimiriski; Vegard Hansen; Hazel Henriksen; Susan Hoivik; Kari Karame; Kari Kjellstad; Halvard Leira; Sverre Lodgaard; Natalia Moen; Knut Gunnar Nustad; Indra Overland; Hilde Eliassen Restad; Pernille Rieker; Ole Jacob Sending; Jack Skarsjo; Per Erik Solli; Olav Stokke; Henrik Thune; Stale Ulriksen; Tore Vogt; Ivar Windheim; Morten Andersen; Tore Bjorgo; Vegard Bye; Benjamin de Carvalho; Oyvind Eggen; Geir Flikke; Nina Graeger; Kjersti Haugan; Daniel Heradstveit; Ingvild Johnsen; John Karlsrud; Heidi Kjaernet; John Sande Lie; Per Botolf Maurseth; Iver Neumann; Silje Fordal Nalsund; Mikkel Frosig Pedersen; Helene Revhaug; Solvi Helen Roen; Darya Shut; John Skogan; Eli Stamnes; Ulf Sverdrup; Kristoffer Andreas Tjaernas; Anna Valberg; Julie Wilhelmsen; Jonny Andreassen; Helge Blkkisrud; Marina Caparini; Cedric de Coning; Stein Sundstol Eriksen; Karsten Friis; Tore Gustavsson; Kristin Haugevik; Liv Hoivik; Karoline Johnsrud; Shemshat Kasimova; Hans Inge Lango; Jo Thori Lind; Arne Melchoir; Trine Nikolaisen; Kari Osland; Erik Reichborn-Kjennerud; Karl Rich; Niels Nagelhus Schia; Anders Sjaastad; Randi Solhjell; Andreas Oien Stensland; Jan-Morten Torrissen; Eridar Visser; Elana Wilson Rowe; NGO: NUPI: Helge Luras

» » » » [PDF: EcoFeminist Indig Rights Applic :: PDF: Media's Population-Terrorism Connection]
» » [Michael Maher, PhD: How & Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection]











No comments:

FLEUR-DE-LIS HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

KaffirLilyRiddle: F(x)population x F(x)consumption = END:CIV
Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement (13:10)
Unified Quest is the Army Chief of Staff's future study plan designed to examine issues critical to current and future force development... - as the world population grows, increased global competition for affordable finite resources, notably energy and rare earth materials, could fuel regional conflict. - water is the new oil. scarcity will confront regions at an accelerated pace in this decade.
US Army: Population vs. Resource Scarcity Study Plan
Human Farming Management: Fake Left v. Right (02:09)
ARMY STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: Office of Dep. Asst. of the Army Environment, Safety and Occupational Health: Richard Murphy, Asst for Sustainability, 24 October 2006
2006: US Army Strategy for Environment
CIA & Pentagon: Overpopulation & Resource Wars [01] [02]
Peak NNR: Scarcity: Humanity’s Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity’s Consequences, by Chris Clugston
Peak Non-Renewable Resources = END:CIV Scarcity Future
Race 2 Save Planet :: END:CIV Resist of Die (01:42) [Full]