KRIPOS: If Norway’s StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial proves that Breivik masturbated at age 4; will that prove Breivik was insane on 22 July 2011?

KRIPOS: Klage: Bedrageri | KRIPOS: Charges: Fraud: Torgeir Husby, Synne Sorheim, Terje Torrissen, Agnar Aspaas, Charles Melle, Svein Holden & Inga Bejer Engh: Norway’s StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry

‘Belief in masturbatory insanity and its treatment with castration and clitoridectomy was not an innocent error: Neither masturbatory insanity, homosexuality, or schizophrenia were “innocent” psychiatric errors.’ - Thomas Szasz

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 06 June 2012

If Norway’s StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial proves that Breivik masturbated at age 4; will that prove Breivik was insane on 22 July 2011?

Today the court debated whether to call Per Olav Næss, as an expert witness. He is a Psychiatrist who observed and treated Anders Breivik when he was four years old in kindergarten when his mother, sister and he was admitted to the National Center for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry for about three weeks in 1983. Breivik and his mother think that what Breivik did or said at the age of four is really irrelevant to his politically motivated criminal acts committed on 22 July 2011. However the Prosecutors and Victims Families are demanding he testify since there are 'compelling interests that the Public and court be informed of all relevant information related to Breivik's alleged possible 'insanity'.

“We agreed with the judge that the case will be as well informed as possible and we believe that his childhood may be an important theme.” - Adv. Mette Yvonne Larsen (Victims Families Advocate). Fair enough: If the judge thinks that the case must be as well informed as possible about all aspects about Breivik's possible sanity or insanity; isn't it also relevant to make sure the court is well informed about Psychiatry's FRAUD?

If the Anders Breivik Trial is not a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial - where the Judge is allowing the State to go on a Massive Fishing Expedition to find any pathetic ‘Breivik masturbated when he was four’ Psychiatric Insanity Excuse (In Remembering Masturbatory Insanity Thomas Szasz, Ph.D. shares the story of what, until relatively recently, had been the most commonly diagnosed and most enthusiastically treated mental disease in the history of medicine, namely, masturbation); yet when it comes to exposing the FRAUD OF PHARMA-PSYCHIATRY: WHORES OF THE COURT: THE MARKETING OF MADNESS MYTH OF MENTAL ILLNESS the court is involved in a CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE?

Hence the Editor of this blog has asked KRIPOS to investigate the following charges of FRAUD.

Notice to Oslo Court: Request Date Judge to Provide Ruling on Breivik Habeus Mentem (Right to Legal Sanity) Application

Notice to Oslo Court: Request Date Judge to Provide Ruling on Breivik Habeus Mentem Application

15 December 2011 | Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik

From: Lara Johnstone

Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 2:56 PM

To: NO: Crt: Oslo District Court: Tinghus Sentralbord; NO Oslo District Court: Tingrett Postmottak

Cc: NO Emb: Pta: Amb Tor Hildan; NO: Crt: Forensic Medicine: Tarjei Rygnestad; NO: Crt: Breivik: Lippestad; NO: Lippestad: Tord; NO: Lippestad: Odd; NO: Prison: Ila: Knut Bjarkeid; NO: Prison: Ila: Post; NO: Crt: SupremeCrt: Chief Justice Tore Schei; NO Police Security Svc; NO Police: Oslo; NO Police Directorate; NO: Police: Justice Dept; NO: MinJustice: Grete Faremo; NO: MinJustice: Pol Advisor: Astrid Bergmal; NO: PM: JStoltenberg: Chief of Staff: Karl Schjott-Pedersen; NO: PM: JStoltenberg: State Sec: Tor Brostigen

Subject: [2] Oslo District Court: Norway v. Breivik: Application: Respondent: Judge Nina Opsahl

Importance: High

Oslo District Court: Registrar,

In the matter between: KINGDOM OF NORWAY v. ANDERS BEIHRING BREVICK

Application between:
LARA JOHNSTONE Applicant
JUDGE NINA OPSAHL First Respondent
ANDERS BREVICK Second Respondent
GEIR LIPPESTAD Third Respondent
SYNNE SERHEIM Fourth Respondent
TORGEIR HUSBY Fifth Respondent
TARJEI RYGNESTAD Sixth Respondent
SVEIN HOLDEN Seventh Respondent

Please could you confirm:

1. The date my application is to be submitted to Judge Opsahl, or the relevant Judge, for their consideration.
   
2. The date the said Judge intends to provide me with their ruling on the matter.

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone
Norway v. Breivik :: Uncensored
www.fleur-de-lis.co.nr

Oslo District Court: Norway v. Breivik: Judge Nina Opsahl: Application for Writ of Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review

Oslo District Court: Norway v. Breivik: Judge Nina Opsahl: Application for Writ of Habeus Mentem & Certiorari/Review

01 December 2011 | Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik

From: Lara Johnstone
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 8:35 PM
To: NO Oslo District Court: Sentralbord; NO Oslo District Court: Admin
Subject: Oslo District Court: Norway v. Breivik: Application: Respondent: Judge Nina Opsahl

ATTENTION:

REGISTRAR & FIRST & SECOND RESPONDENTS
Registrar of the Oslo District Court
Sorenskriver og administrasjon
Postadresse: Postboks 8023 Dep., 0030 Oslo
Besøksadresse: C.J. Hambros Plass 4, 0164 Oslo
Sentralbord 22 03 52 00
Tel/Faks: 22 03 5212 | 22 03 53 54
E-post: **********@domstol.no
E-post: **********@domstol.no

In the matter between:

KINGDOM OF NORWAY v. ANDERS BEIHRING BREVICK

Application between:
LARA JOHNSTONE Applicant
JUDGE NINA OPSAHL First Respondent
ANDERS BREVICK Second Respondent
GEIR LIPPESTAD Third Respondent
SYNNE SERHEIM Fourth Respondent
TORGEIR HUSBY Fifth Respondent
TARJEI RYGNESTAD Sixth Respondent
SVEIN HOLDEN Seventh Respondent

Please find attached for your attention the following PDF documents: Application in terms of Article’s 2, 4, 85, 100, 110a, 110b, of Norwegian Constitution; and Article’s 1, 5, 6, 9, 13 and 14 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

• Filing Sheet
  
• Notice of Motion
  
• Founding Affidavit

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the applicant herewith applies to this court for an order from Judge Nina Opsahl that (A) Anders Breivik be provided a copy of this application for his consideration, and to be ordered to provide the court with his personal written response to the application, to be documented into the court record. (B) If approved by Anders Breivik, additional orders as follows: [I] A writ of Habeus Mentem on behalf of Anders Breivik psycho-cultural integrity right to a free and fair trial; and [II] writ of Certiorari/Review of the Psychiatric Evaluation Report of Psychiatrists: Synne Serheim and Torgeir Husby as to the Mens Rea political necessity criminal liability of Anders Breivik terrorist acts, on 22 July 2011. Please take notice that the accompanying affidavit of Lara Johnstone will be used in support of this application. 

KINDLY place this matter before Judge Nina Opsahl for her consideration at her earliest convenience. 

Dated at George, Southern Cape, South Africa, this 29th day of November, 2011. Lara Johnstone, Pro Se Honourable Transparency Copies: (A) Honourable Tore Schei, Chief Justice (B) King Harald V, King of Norway (C) Hon. Jens Stoltenberg, Prime Minister (D) Hon. Dag Terje Andersen, President (E) Gen. Harald Sunde, NATO: Military Comm.: Chief of Staff, Chief of Defence (F) HE Tor Christian Hildan, Ambassador of Norway, Pretoria (G) Professor Duarte Nuno Vieira (Portugal), European Council of Legal Medicine: Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal, I.P.[1]; and The International Academy of Legal Medicine[2] 

Lara (Clann/Tribe Name: Johnstone) I (Sovereign or alleged Corporate identity) do not endorse any contract which does not fulfill the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract, namely: (1) Full Disclosure; (2) Equal Consideration; (3) Lawful Clear and Concise Terms and Conditions simply explained; and (4) Signatures of both/all Parties (In accordance to Common Law, I also consider corporations to be without legal standing, as they have no mind, body, legs, eyes, emotions; and hence are legal fictions). As a member of Radical Honesty culture I always endorse the resolution of all disagreements and/or misunderstandings in accordance to Radical Honesty cultural practices (See: Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton), or via independent arbitration that does not involve bloodsucking parasite lawyers; and am willing to consider the practices of other cultures, who seriously and sincerely consider mine.