NO Env. Appeals Board Rules 'Media's Censorship of Population & Consumption does not Affect Environment''

NO Env. Appeals Board Rules 'OverPopulation and Consumption does not Affect Environment'

The Environmental Appeals Board’s ruling that Editors decision-making to censor information about the Media’s Population-Environment-Terrorism Connection during Breivik’s Highly Public Terrorism trial, alleging that it was not ‘Environmental Information’ is beyond absurd, and totally lacking in factual and legal justifications.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 12 November 2012

Anders Breivik Alleged that his Terrorism was motivated by the Media’s Censorship of Non-Violent Problem Solving, which facilitated a socio-political pressure cooker reality for the media's If it Leads, It Bleeds Profit from violence.

Oslo Organized Crime Police Investigation Report: "Explanation of 22 July 2011, doc 08,01, states:

“[Breivik] emphasizes that if he had not been censored by the media all his life, he would not have had to do what he did. He believes the media have the main responsibility for what has happened because they did not publish his opinions.... The low-intensity civil war that he had already described, had lasted until now with ideological struggle and censorship of cultural conservatives...... He explains that this is the worst day of his life and that he has dreaded this for 2 years. He has been censored for years. He mentions Dagbladet and Aftenposten as those who among other things have censored him..... He says that he also wrote “essays” that he tried to publish via the usual channels, but that they were all censored..... The subject summarizes: As long as more than twelve were executed, the operation will still be a success. The experts ask how the number twelve comes into consideration. Twelve dead are needed to penetrate the censorship wall, he explains..... About his thoughts on the Utøya killings now, the subject says: The goal was to execute as many as possible. At least 30. It was horrible, but the number had to be assessed based on the global censorship limit. Utøya was a martyrdom, and I am very proud of it..... The subject says in the conversation that he knows the truth that is hidden from others. He believes that there is a civil war in the country. He believes he had to kill at least twelve, because there is a censorship-wall preventing an open debate about what is happening in the country..... So I knew I had to cross a certain threshold to exceed the censorship-wall of the international media."

[Update] 170 Bar Association Complaints filed against Norway v. Breivik Attorneys: Participation in StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial to Deny Defendent & Victims a Treason Trial

[Update] 170 Bar Association Complaints filed against Norway v. Breivik Attorneys (Defendant: 4; Victims Families: 166)

Norsk Advokat Foreningen/Bar Association: Complaints: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court. Complaint Submitted: [here]. Subsequent Correspondence to Bar Association: Disciplinary Committee & Disciplinary Board: [01]

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 21 June 2012

From: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater: With reference to your e-mail of 20th of June, and your previous 170 complaints sent the Disciplinary Board last week.

From: Advokatforeningen: With reference to your e-mail below, and your previous 170 complaints send the Norwegian Bar Association's Disciplinary Committee last week.

From: Habeus 4 Mentem: Right to Legal Sanity:

[1] Please provide The Bar Association Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for demanding complainants waste paper, ink and non-renewable transporation resources by printing, signing and mailing complaints to the Bar Association; and refusing digitally signed complaints submitted by email, which are much more beneficial to the environment, and are exact environmentally digital copies of print versions?

[A] Does the Bar Association endorse the European Court of Human Rights (Lithgow & others v United Kingdom) principle that every individual who files a legal application to a Norwegian Court has a right to a timeous and precise written response informing them whether their application has been accepted, or if denied, reasons for such denial, or to inform the individual of additional information required before the complaint can be accepted?

170 Bar Association Complaints filed against Norway v. Breivik Attorneys: Participation in StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial to Deny Defendent & Victims a Treason Trial

170 Bar Association Complaints filed against Norway v. Breivik Attorneys (Defendant: 4; Victims Families: 166)

Norsk Advokat Foreningen/Bar Association: Complaints: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court [here]. Bar Association Response & response to the Bar Association correspondence is below.

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 21 June 2012

From: Disiplinærnemnden for advokater: The Disciplinary Board has received your complaints concerning numerous lawyers participating in the case against Anders Behring Breivik.....

From: Advokatforeningen: The Norwegian Bar Association’s Disciplinary Committee has received your complaints concerning numerous lawyers participating in the case against Anders Behring Breivik......

From: Habeus 4 Mentem: Right to Legal Sanity:

[1] Please provide The Bar Association Complaints Environmental Principles decision-making justifications for demanding complainants waste paper, ink and non-renewable transporation resources by printing, signing and mailing complaints to the Bar Association; and refusing digitally signed complaints submitted by email, which are much more beneficial to the environment, and are exact environmentally digital copies of print versions?

[A] Does the Bar Association endorse the European Court of Human Rights (Lithgow & others v United Kingdom) principle that every individual who files a legal application to a Norwegian Court has a right to a timeous and precise written response informing them whether their application has been accepted, or if denied, reasons for such denial, or to inform the individual of additional information required before the complaint can be accepted?

Advokat Disciplinary Board Complaints: Anne-Gry Rønning-Aaby | Borghild Fjeld Gylvik | Arne Seland | Ole Klanderud

Norsk Advokaten: Disciplinary Board: Anne-Gry Rønning-Aaby | Borghild Fjeld Gylvik | Arne Seland | Ole Klanderud

Complaint: Violation of: CCBE Code of Ethics: Obstruction of Justice Participation in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial, to (1) deny Defendant his Political Necessity Treason Trial; and (2) support Corruption of the Court to deny submittal to the Court of Controversial Evidence related to: [1] Media’s Environment-Population-Terrorism Connection; [2] Norway’s endorsement of Political Psychiatry & Psychiatric Fraud; [3] Masculine Insecurity Human Farming for Profit Kaffir Legal Matrix; [4] Norwegian Goverments Endorsement for ANC’s Terrorism & Breeding War; [5] Norwegian Commitment to Rainbow Race Multiculturism is a Fraud

Andrea Muhrrteyn | Norway v. Breivik | 18 June 2012

Complainant filed two applications to the Oslo District Court and a subsequent application to the Norway Supreme Court in the Norway v. Breivik matter, wherein Adv.For.Respondent is a legal representative in the matter in dispute. Adv.For.Respondent appears to either individually as a legal representative in fear of White Supremacy Psycho-Tyranny-Terror, or as part of a collective conspiracy, to be a participant to the obstruction of Justice by Denying the Defendant his Political Necessity Defence Treason Trial.

It appears as if the legal participants involved in this matter are involved in a StaliNorsk Political Psychiatry Show Trial on the world stage, demonstrating to the world how to rob a Political Dissenter Terrorist of his rule of law right to a Treason Trial.

Breivik Case & Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas:

Reidar Roll was the Secretary General for the ICDE for 20 years. He writes on his blog at Minervas: Breivik Case and the Use of Soviet Phychiatric Hospitals as Methods for Discrediting Political Ideas that he is not impressed with the Norwegian State Attorney's strategy of focussing on a Political Psychiatry Trial; instead of a Political Terror Treason Trial; which he says is “dangerously close to using Soviet methods to supress political ideas that are seen to be dangerous to the social democratic order in Norway.”